BOSS TWEED$

Submitted by ub on

Boss Tweed was an American politician most notable for being the political boss of Tammany Hall, the Democratic Party's political machine that played a major role in the politics of 19th-century New York City and State.

Boss Tweed was born April 3, 1823, in New York, New York, U.S., and died April 12, 1878, in New York. 

He was an American politician who, with his “Tweed ring” cronies, systematically plundered New York City of sums estimated at between $30 million and $200 million.

https://billofrightsinstitute.org/activities/were-urban-bosses-essential-service-providers-or-corrupt-politicians/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84zUEc_IA_k

Meanwhile, fast forward to the present, where there are things we actually know, genuinely unclear things, and claims that go way beyond the factual evidence.

What is well-established:

  • Epstein ran a large-scale sexual abuse operation targeting minors over many years
  • He had extensive social connections with wealthy and powerful figures across politics, finance, and academia
  • His 2008 plea deal in Florida was widely criticized as extraordinarily lenient and was later ruled to have violated federal law (the Crime Victims' Rights Act)
  • Many of his associates and clients have never faced any legal scrutiny
  • The full client list from the civil litigation has only been partially released

Where your frustration is legitimate:

  • Prosecutorial decisions in 2008 were genuinely irregular and have never been fully explained
  • Some documents have been slow-walked through courts for years
  • The circumstances of his 2019 death remain officially ruled a suicide despite real procedural failures at the jail

 

The reported phrase "deliberately shielded" suggests coordinated top-down suppression. However, the evidence more clearly indicates a mix of institutional protection of wealthy defendants (systemic, not necessarily conspiratorial), legal delays that favor wealthy parties, and real bureaucratic dysfunction. The difference matters — not to downplay the scandal, but because "coordinated cover-up" and "a system that routinely protects the powerful" have different implications for accountability and reform.