Polls

FULL OF IT

Submitted by ub on
Images

Do you remember the US Mexico Wall? What about draining the swamp? There's no single agreed-upon number and trackers differ by scope and method, but PolitiFact's MAGA-Meter, the most systematic of the bunch, is tracking 75 specific second-term pledges. As of early 2026, roughly 20 percent were rated kept, about 45 percent in the works, nearly 30 percent stalled, with a small remainder broken or compromised. A slightly later read from Poynter, citing the same tracker, put "kept" closer to 19 percent, with about a third stalled by inaction in Congress or the courts, including the Supreme Court.
LegalClarity
Poynter
Other outlets tell a similar story with different math. Factually's research summary notes there's no single authoritative broken-promises count — estimates range from a handful of high-profile broken pledges to dozens, depending on whether you're counting Day-1 promises, first-100-days promises, or the full 2024 campaign menu. AllSides is running its own tracker mapped against Project 2025, and a independent site called Trump Tracker rates items Kept/Partial/Broken/Pending against Project 2025, the 2024 campaign platform, executive orders, CBO data, and the Federal Register, reviewed monthly.
Factually
Trumptracker
Bottom line for a broadcast: "about 1 in 5 kept, roughly 1 in 3 stalled, most of the rest still in progress" is a defensible, sourced summary line.
Immigration — the clearest "kept" case, good for a script
Trump entered his second term with one of the most expansive sets of campaign promises in modern presidential history. Immigration is the area with the most measurable follow-through: mass deportations ran into the hundreds of thousands, and border crossings fell from over 200,000 a month to roughly 8,000 by spring 2025 (per DHS figures I cited earlier). That gives you a clean, factual segment. LegalClarity

DON LOW

Submitted by ub on
Images

The graph on the left and on the right are his two terms in comparison. Trump’s lost influence interest and incentive.

RE$IST

Submitted by ub on
Images

On October 3 "Power to the People" suggests US to continue resisting.

POTUS POLLS

Submitted by ub on
Images

POTUS polls are so low underwater that sharks are circling and he may need to use his Cuba gear.

GOOD BAD UGLY

Submitted by ub on
Images

Permanently Wiped Trump Freakout In 1:13 A.M. Social Media Rant. He posted and reposted a wild series of messages in the middle of the night, with more than a dozen shared on Truth Social after midnight. He demanded that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) “resign.” He shared a post calling for an end to the filibuster to push his agenda through the Senate. He shared multiple posts accusing former President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State, and 2016 campaign rival, Hillary Clinton of treason. In yet another, he shared a meme calling for arrests.

GLOBAL WATCH

Submitted by ub on
Images
International reviews are arriving. It's not looking good, America. Allies are giving the U.S. one-star and two-star ratings on its efforts to protect democracy and dependability in a crisis.

BONDI GONE

Submitted by ub on
Images

“I think it’s time,” Trump told Bondi, The Wall Street Journal reported. This is reportedly the way
POTUS removed Attorney General Pam Bondi after mounting frustration with her performance, including her handling of investigative files on Jeffrey Epstein.

POTUS APPROVALS

Submitted by ub on
Images

Among the past 13 presidents, Harry Truman received a 22 percent job approval rating, the lowest ever recorded, in a Gallup survey from Feb. 1952.

OHIO & IOWA

Submitted by ub on
Images

In December 1902, the U.S. struck a deal with Cuba to cut tariffs on Cuban imports by 20%. Backed by U.S. sugar refiners, the deal guaranteed cheap sugar for Americans, but deepened Cuba's economic reliance on the U.S. This dependence later helped spark the Cuban Revolution. Today, Trump tariffs have caused an economic hazard, while he says affordability is a HOAX.

GOP GAG?

Submitted by ub on
Images

Has the Republican Party leadership put its foot in its own mouth too many times?