ANGRY US VOTERS
If you agree with the “mad as hell” analogy, then on November 3, at 3P go outdoors, and say I wont take this anymore!
If you agree with the “mad as hell” analogy, then on November 3, at 3P go outdoors, and say I wont take this anymore!
Barbaric government officials
An overwhelming outcome is expected to dominate the vote count in favor of the Democrats.
As PANDORA PATIENTLY goes for many forms and methods… a countdown has begun before the midterm elections.
GET-OUT-THE-VOTE FRIENDLY NON PARTICIPANT FIELlD GUIDE FOR AMERICAN CITIZENS.
Nonpartisan Checklist for the November 3, 2026 Election
6WHAT TO DO NOW
Apathy Is Dangerous: Why?
When Silence Speaks: The Civic Urgency of “For What It’s Worth”
Don’t Stand by: A Protest Song’s Call to Vote
From Protest to Participation: Why Apathy Can’t Win
The Danger of Looking Away
Wake Up and Vote: The Enduring Warning of “For What It’s Worth”
Apathy Is Not Neutral
When People Stop Paying Attention, Democracy Pays the Price
Listen, Act, Vote: The Lasting Power of “For What It’s Worth”
Songs Against Silence
The Republicans appear to be worried about the mid-terms, as the administration attacks Democrats and using US State Department to officially accuse what their leader calls Dumocracy and Cuba of being the “capital of 21st-century communism,” and of plotting an anti-American revolution.
He claimed he would get tired of winning. Perhaps he mean whining instead. He sued 30 states and DC to seize our private voter files, birthdate, address, Social Security number, and it keeps getting thrown out of court. Trump’s own Judge Kari Dooley slammed the door in Connecticut, and the information stayed exactly where it belongs.
Why isn’t every US Citizen participation consistently requested and civic participation required?
No court ruling yet — it's still inside the FCC. This hasn't reached a federal judge. Right now it's playing out through the FCC's own administrative process:
ABC filed its "reply comments" on July 7 defending "The View" as a bona fide news program under a 2002 FCC precedent, arguing the government can't "sit in an editor's chair."
More than 77,000 public comments were submitted, with an undeniable majority backing "The View" and free speech, according to ABC's filing.
ABC is also arguing the FCC's selective focus — going after daytime/late-night TV while leaving talk radio alone — isn't evenhanded regulation.
The FCC pushed back through a spokesperson, saying ABC should focus on compliance rather than "misleading the public."
There's a separate wrinkle worth watching: the sole Democratic FCC commissioner, Anna Gomez, has alleged the agency offered other ABC affiliates amnesty for late equal-time disclosures but withheld that same offer from the Disney-owned station now under investigation — which, if it holds up, would be a much sharper claim of selective/unequal treatment than the broader "bias" argument.
Separately, ABC's local station license renewals are also under review, with public opposition to those due July 29 and replies due in August.