Criminal Justice

MAXWELL HAMMERED

Submitted by ub on
Images

Judge Slams the Gavel on Maxwell's Freedom Bid Ghislaine Maxwell's last-ditch effort to overturn her sex trafficking conviction hit a wall Tuesday, when a federal judge rejected her habeas petition in blunt terms.

CRIMES ON KIDS

Submitted by ub on
Images

Crimes against minors include any physical, sexual, or emotional maltreatment, neglect, exploitation, or human trafficking directed at individuals under the age of 18. These offenses range from physical abuse and domestic violence to rapidly growing digital threats like online sextortion, grooming, and the distribution of child sexual abuse material… Crimes against kids and more below

POOLGATE?

Submitted by ub on
Images

This is an image of the pool before Trump decided to repair it costing taxpayers millions.

$6000000 WOMAN

Submitted by ub on
Images

Is E Jean Carroll the news Six Million Dollsr a woman? This comparison is about money, here's the context:

NOT GOING BACK

Submitted by ub on
Images

As America’s favorite pastime begins, the baseball season has a famous phrase, one, two three strike you’re out.
The favorable national environment and a potential #GOP polling collapse with #Latino voters could again make the #SunshineState competitive in the 2026 midterm elections. And not only in Florida.

PEDOS

Submitted by ub on
Images

Do not celebrate them, prosecute them all.

MOCKING A UK MONARCHY

Submitted by ub on
Images

Prince Andrew aka Dandy Andy was arrested and questioned for several hours by British police over allegations of misconduct in public office tied to his association with Jeffrey Epstein. The arrest marked the first time in nearly 400 years that a senior British royal had been detained, highlighting a significant shift in public and institutional attitudes toward the monarchy. In response, King Charles III broke with traditional royal restraint and issued a public statement regarding his brother’s arrest.

A MAXWELL HAMMER?

Submitted by ub on
Images

Will Ghislaine Maxwell spill the beans before Congress? The Fifth Amendment lets a witness refuse to answer any question if the answer could expose them to criminal liability. A few key points that matter here: It’s question-by-question. She has to be asked something first, then she can invoke the Fifth. It applies even after conviction if: There’s potential exposure to other crimes
There are uncharged co-conspirators Her answers could lead to new investigations or charges
She doesn’t have to explain why answering would be risky—just that it is.
So if a member asks: “Did you introduce X politician to Epstein?” She can simply say:
“On the advice of counsel, I respectfully invoke my Fifth Amendment right.”

GLOMAR WONT FLY

Submitted by ub on
Images

The following term, NCND, is not appropriate for the recent DOJ dump of the Epstein Files. It is called GLOMAR, on PENETRATION, the term NCND is inappropriate for the recent DOJ release of the Epstein Files. GLOMAR involves PENETRATION. A Glomar response is a legal term for a U.S. government agency's refusal to confirm or deny the existence of records in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, often summarized as “we can neither confirm nor deny” (NCND).

FROM MAGI TO MAGA

Submitted by ub on
Images

If a lesson of January 6 is that elections can be undone by force, the lesson of Trump v. United States is that accountability can be undone by doctrine. The Court may insist it was protecting the presidency, but the effect was to protect one man. In doing so, it told future presidents exactly how far they can go and how safely.