Did the Republican Party mostly manage to load the US Supreme Court with a few unethical and entitled corrupt American creeps?
The original filter for US government corruption was the Senate until the GOP sold out. American investigative journalists have found that Republicans packed SCOTUS with cretinism.
All 9 Supreme Court justices push back on oversight: 'Raises more questions,' Senate chair says
In a rare joint statement, the justices said they want to "provide new clarity.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/9-supreme-court-justices-push-back-over…
Clarence Thomas Is On a Quest to Be the Most Corrupt Justice In the Court
The Supreme Court justice has reportedly spent decades accepting exorbitant gifts, luxury vacations, and yacht rides from a major GOP power player—none of which were disclosed to the American public.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/04/clarence-thomas-ethics-violatio…
'It is just inexplicable': Former prosecutor explains how Clarence Thomas may have broken the law
https://www.alternet.org/it-is-just-inexplicable/?recip_id=716131&list_…
The real reason for the Supreme Court’s corruption crisis. Who watches the philosopher kings with lifetime appointments?
https://www.vox.com/politics/2023/4/25/23697394/supreme-court-clarence-…
The Stench of Corruption Is Growing Stronger Around the Supreme Court
Chief Justice John Roberts insists the court can police itself, but all evidence points to the contrary.
https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/the-stench-of-corruption-is-…
Let's Just Say It Very Clearly: The US Supreme Court Is Corrupt
Public outrage is building: the Court's approval rating is now around 40%—Congress needs to act before an entire branch of government sinks into an irredeemable Trump-fueled muck of corruption.
https://www.commondreams.org/views/2022/03/16/lets-just-say-it-very-cle…
Once upon a time not too long ago SCOTUS ruled on the first spam filter in the 1970 case Rowan v. United States Post Office Department concerned the Postal Revenue and Federal Salary Act, which allowed homeowners to remove themselves from mailing lists for lewd advertisements by notifying the Postmaster General. Companies claimed that the Act negatively affected their business activities and violated their constitutional right to free speech. The Supreme Court disagreed, holding that, because “[t]he asserted right of a mailer . . . stops at the outer boundary of every person’s domain,” mailers could not force homeowners to continue receiving offensive mailings.