Trump's recent actions regarding military leadership and legal advisors are part of a broader strategy aimed at consolidating power.
He removed people who might have stopped illegal or extreme actions he wanted to pursue. This interpretation emphasizes concerns about the military's role, checks on presidential power, and the potential for abuse.
These actions are directly linked to the Republicans' desire for unchecked authority, or that the firings were part of a broader plan to manipulate or control the military, taps into fears about the politicization of military leadership and the erosion of safeguards that ensure civilian control over the military. The idea is that firing those legal checks or moral resistance could pave the way for more extreme actions that violate laws or norms.
There is a deep concern about democracy, governance, and the rule of law. It’s important to weigh different sources and perspectives on these actions to gain a fuller understanding, particularly from military and legal experts who can assess the implications.
I lived through this already so this is nothing new for me. Dejavu all over again as Yogi would say.
What do you think about this interpretation, or the broader context of what might be at stake? Watch the major motion picture below